Conjecture 017

Genuine rational Bianchi newforms in the level aspect

Conjecture
RetainedLMFDB tested & reviewedAI selection
Field
Modular and Automorphic Forms
Domain
Bianchi modular forms; base change; rational Hecke fields; level aspect
Review
Unresolved
  • Bianchi modular forms
  • base change
  • rational Hecke fields
  • level aspect
Added Updated

Photograph: Nick Fewings / Unsplash

Open paper PDF

Summary

For a fixed imaginary quadratic field, we conjecture that finite-order twists of cyclic base change have density zero among non-CM rational Bianchi newforms of parallel weight two and trivial central character, ordered by the norm of the level. We record the observed decay in the deepest available fixed-field datasets and isolate the counting problem required for a proof.

Abstract

For a fixed imaginary quadratic field, we conjecture that finite-order twists of cyclic base change have density zero among non-CM rational Bianchi newforms of parallel weight two and trivial central character, ordered by the norm of the level. We record the observed decay in the deepest available fixed-field datasets and isolate the counting problem required for a proof.

Rational Bianchi newforms

Fix an imaginary quadratic field KK. Let RK(X)\mathcal R_K(X) be the set of Galois orbits of cuspidal Bianchi newforms FF over KK satisfying

kF=2,ωF=1,QF=Q,F non-CM,NNFX,k_F=2,\qquad \omega_F=1,\qquad \mathbb Q_F=\mathbb Q, \qquad F\text{ non-CM},\qquad \mathrm N\mathfrak N_F\leq X,

where each Galois orbit is counted once. Let LK(X)\mathcal L_K(X) be the subset consisting of forms of the shape

FBCK/Q(f)ψ,F\simeq \mathop{\mathrm{BC}}_{K/\mathbb Q}(f)\otimes\psi,

where ff is a classical newform and ψ\psi is a finite-order Hecke character of KK.

Conjecture 1. For every imaginary quadratic field KK,

#RK(X)limX#LK(X)#RK(X)=0.\#\mathcal R_K(X)\longrightarrow\infty \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \lim_{X\to\infty}\frac{\#\mathcal L_K(X)}{\#\mathcal R_K(X)}=0.

Numerical evidence

The available data contain 232143232143 qualifying non-CM rational orbits over 501501 represented fields; 1705317053 are marked as direct or twisted base change. Because the level coverage is highly nonuniform, the meaningful statistic is fixed-field decay rather than the pooled proportion.

For the five deepest datasets, the cumulative lifted proportion changed as follows:

Disc(K)\mathop{\mathrm{Disc}}(K)proportion at X=1000X=1000terminal proportion
3-30.1692310.1692310.0316640.031664
4-40.1308900.1308900.0292000.029200
7-70.1265820.1265820.0273320.027332
8-80.1420450.1420450.0348670.034867
11-110.1630770.1630770.0347650.034765

Decay of the lifted proportion in the deepest fixed-field datasets.

The final disjoint high-level bins in these five fields contain approximately 1.7%1.7\%2.6%2.6\% lifted forms. All nine fields with substantial data beyond level norm 10001000 showed a lower terminal cumulative ratio than at X=1000X=1000.

Why density zero is plausible

Base change and its finite-order twists arise from a lower-dimensional lifting construction. The full Bianchi cohomology should contain genuinely three-dimensional automorphic phenomena that become dominant as the level grows. The observed concentration of lifted forms at very small level and their subsequent decay is consistent with this expectation.

The rationality restriction makes the conjecture substantially harder than a dimension comparison. Complex dimensions weight a Galois orbit by the degree of its Hecke field, whereas RK(X)\mathcal R_K(X) counts only degree-one orbits.

A lower bound for the lifted family

The growth assumption in Conjecture 1 is in fact easy to satisfy. Fix a non-CM elliptic curve over Q\mathbb Q and let Π\Pi be its cyclic base change to KK. Twisting Π\Pi by quadratic Hecke characters χ/K\chi/K preserves parallel weight 22, rational Hecke field, non-CM status and trivial central character. Away from a fixed finite set,

n(Πχ)=n(Π)f(χ)2.\mathfrak n(\Pi\otimes\chi)=\mathfrak n(\Pi)\mathfrak f(\chi)^2.

Counting quadratic characters by conductor therefore yields

#LK(X)KX1/2.\#\mathcal L_K(X)\gg_K X^{1/2}.

Consequently #RK(X)\#\mathcal R_K(X)\to\infty for every KK. This lower bound does not determine the ratio: the full rational family may grow faster, at the same rate, or irregularly.

Relation with known results

Dimension formulae for lifted and non-genuine Bianchi subspaces are available at certain squarefree, Galois-stable levels. They concern full complex dimensions and do not count rational Galois orbits. Published finite computations of rational Bianchi forms provide evidence but no varying-level asymptotic. The possibility that twisting a classical form with nonrational coefficient field produces a rational Bianchi form also prevents one from counting the numerator using only rational classical sources.

Open difficulties

A proof requires

#LK(X)=o(#RK(X)).\#\mathcal L_K(X)=o\bigl(\#\mathcal R_K(X)\bigr).

A plausible upper bound for the numerator is

#LK(X)K,εX1/2+ε,\#\mathcal L_K(X)\ll_{K,\varepsilon}X^{1/2+\varepsilon},

but this must include ramified finite-order twists and sources whose rationality changes after twisting. The essential missing input is a lower bound for the denominator that grows faster than X1/2X^{1/2}, or a direct abundance theorem for genuine rational Bianchi forms. Cohomological dimension estimates do not provide such a bound because they do not isolate Hecke-field degree one.

References

  • R. P. Langlands, Base Change for GL(2)\mathrm{GL}(2), Annals of Mathematics Studies 96, Princeton University Press, 1980.

  • M. H. Şengün and P. Tsaknias, Dimension formulae for spaces of lifted Bianchi modular forms, Math. Comp. 83 (2014), 1469–1490.

  • A. D. Rahm and P. Tsaknias, Genuine Bianchi modular forms of higher level, at varying weight and discriminant, J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 31 (2019), 617–646.

  • J. E. Cremona, L. Dembélé, A. Pacetti, C. Schembri and J. Voight, On rational Bianchi newforms and abelian surfaces with quaternionic multiplication, Math. Comp. 91 (2022), 1491–1515.

  • D. J. Wright, Distribution of discriminants of abelian extensions, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 58 (1989), 17–50.

Paper edition

Read or download the typeset paper

The PDF contains the same complete journal-style article presented above.

Open paper PDF