Conjecture 016

Unit-signature ranks in equal-discriminant cubic fields

Conjecture
RetainedLMFDB tested & reviewed
Field
Algebraic Number Theory
Domain
cubic fields; units; signatures; common discriminants
Review
Unresolved
  • cubic fields
  • units
  • signatures
  • common discriminants
  • arithmetic statistics
Added Updated

Photograph: Nick Fewings / Unsplash

Open paper PDF

Summary

For ordered pairs of distinct totally real S₃-cubic fields with the same discriminant, we conjecture that the two unit-signature ranks are asymptotically independent. The conjecture separates the 2-primary archimedean invariant from the 3-primary ring-class mechanism producing common-discriminant multiplets.

Abstract

For ordered pairs of distinct totally real S3S_3-cubic fields with the same discriminant, we conjecture that the two unit-signature ranks are asymptotically independent. The conjecture separates the 22-primary archimedean invariant from the 33-primary ring-class mechanism producing common-discriminant multiplets.

Statement of the conjecture

For a positive discriminant DD, let MD\mathcal M_D be the set of Q\mathbb Q-isomorphism classes of totally real S3S_3-cubic fields of discriminant DD, and put

P(X)={(K,K):KK, K,KMD for some DX}.\overrightarrow{\mathcal P}(X) =\{(K,K'):K\neq K',\ K,K'\in\mathcal M_D \text{ for some }D\leq X\}.

For a totally real cubic field KK, define

s(K)=dimF2im(sgn:OK×{±1}3){1,2,3}.s(K)=\dim_{\mathbb F_2}\mathop{\mathrm{im}}\bigl(\operatorname{sgn}:\mathcal O_K^\times \longrightarrow\{\pm1\}^3\bigr)\in\{1,2,3\}.

For s,t{1,2,3}s,t\in\{1,2,3\}, let

us(X)=Pr(K,K)P(X)[s(K)=s],bs,t(X)=Pr(K,K)P(X)[s(K)=s, s(K)=t].\begin{aligned} u_s(X)&= \Pr_{(K,K')\in\overrightarrow{\mathcal P}(X)}\bigl[s(K)=s\bigr],\\ b_{s,t}(X)&= \Pr_{(K,K')\in\overrightarrow{\mathcal P}(X)} \bigl[s(K)=s,\ s(K')=t\bigr]. \end{aligned}

Conjecture 1. Every marginal us(X)u_s(X) has positive lower limit, and for all s,t{1,2,3}s,t\in\{1,2,3\},

limXbs,t(X)us(X)ut(X)=1.\lim_{X\to\infty} \frac{b_{s,t}(X)}{u_s(X)u_t(X)}=1.

Numerical evidence

The common-discriminant sample exhibits no large persistent correlation after accounting for the one-field marginal distribution. The most stable cells are those involving signature ranks 22 and 33; the rank-11 cells are much rarer and therefore converge more slowly. Across cumulative cutoffs and in the wider stress sample, the observed joint-frequency matrix was close to the outer product of its marginals, with the largest visible discrepancies concentrated in the sparse rank-11 rows and columns.

The common-discriminant weighting is important. A discriminant supporting mDm_D fields contributes mD(mD1)m_D(m_D-1) ordered pairs, so large multiplets receive substantial weight. Numerical agreement therefore tests more than independence in the ordinary one-field family.

Heuristic motivation

The multiplicity of totally real cubic fields with one discriminant is controlled by 33-primary class or ring-class data in the common quadratic resolvent. By contrast, the unit-signature rank is an archimedean invariant tied to the 22-Selmer signature map. This separation of primes suggests that conditioning on a large 33-primary multiplet should not change the limiting 22-primary signature distribution.

The conjecture is nevertheless nontrivial. Siblings share the complete discriminant and the same quadratic resolvent, and the pair measure is strongly biased toward resolvents with unusually large 33-torsion. It is therefore necessary to control both arithmetic correlations within a multiplet and heterogeneity between different discriminants.

Relation with known heuristics

Dummit–Voight heuristics predict the one-field distribution of unit-signature ranks in totally real S3S_3-cubic fields. Common-discriminant multiplicity formulas describe the 33-primary mechanism producing the sibling family. Neither framework gives a joint law for two distinct cubic subfields of the same ring-class construction. Existing average results for 22-torsion under local or shape restrictions do not cover the size-biased pair measure appearing here.

Open difficulties

Write

mD=#MD,kD,s=#{KMD:s(K)=s}.m_D=\#\mathcal M_D, \qquad k_{D,s}=\#\{K\in\mathcal M_D:s(K)=s\}.

Then the conjecture asks for asymptotics of

DXkD,skD,tandDXkD,s(mD1)\sum_{D\leq X}k_{D,s}k_{D,t} \quad\text{and}\quad \sum_{D\leq X}k_{D,s}(m_D-1)

relative to

DXmD(mD1).\sum_{D\leq X}m_D(m_D-1).

The diagonal case s=ts=t requires the appropriate factorial correction because KKK\neq K'. A proof would need uniform control of the signature distribution within variable ring-class multiplets and of the tails of the mD(mD1)m_D(m_D-1) weighting. No present theorem supplies such a decorated multiplet count.

References

  • D. S. Dummit and J. Voight, The 22-Selmer group of a number field and heuristics for narrow class groups and signature ranks of units, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 117 (2018), 682–726.

  • D. C. Mayer, Classifying multiplets of totally real cubic fields, Int. J. Number Theory 18 (2022), 813–852.

  • M. Bhargava and I. Varma, The mean number of 33-torsion elements in the class groups and ideal groups of quadratic orders, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 112 (2016), 235–266.

Paper edition

Read or download the typeset paper

The PDF contains the same complete journal-style article presented above.

Open paper PDF