Conjecture 040

Fixed-degree Atkin–Lehner sign statistics for Hilbert newforms

Conjecture
RetainedLMFDB tested & reviewed
Field
Modular and Automorphic Forms
Domain
Hilbert modular forms; Atkin–Lehner signs; root numbers; Hecke fields
Review
Unresolved
  • Hilbert modular forms
  • Atkin–Lehner signs
  • root numbers
  • Hecke fields
  • fields of rationality
  • equidistribution
Added Updated

Photograph: Nick Fewings / Unsplash

Open paper PDF

Summary

We conjecture joint equidistribution of prescribed local Atkin–Lehner signs among genuine parallel-weight-two Hilbert newform orbits of a fixed Hecke-field degree. Ambient Plancherel equidistribution gives the corresponding statement without the rationality-degree restriction. The fixed-degree condition is global and thin, and no known trace-formula projector isolates it.

Abstract

We conjecture joint equidistribution of prescribed local Atkin–Lehner signs among genuine parallel-weight-two Hilbert newform orbits of a fixed Hecke-field degree. Ambient Plancherel equidistribution gives the corresponding statement without the rationality-degree restriction. The fixed-degree condition is global and thin, and no known trace-formula projector isolates it.

The fixed-degree family

Let FF be a real quadratic field with narrow class number one, let d1d\ge1, and let SS be a finite nonempty set of prime ideals of OF\mathcal O_F satisfying q2DF\mathfrak q\nmid2D_F for every qS\mathfrak q\in S. Let HF,d,S(X)\mathcal H_{F,d,S}(X) be the Hecke-Galois orbits OO of parallel-weight-two Hilbert newforms such that

  • the central character is trivial;

  • the form is non-CM and not a base change from Q\mathbb Q;

  • [KO:Q]=d[K_O:\mathbb Q]=d;

  • NnOX\mathrm N\mathfrak n_O\le X;

  • vq(nO)=1v_{\mathfrak q}(\mathfrak n_O)=1 for every qS\mathfrak q\in S.

Write Wq(O){±1}W_{\mathfrak q}(O)\in\{\pm1\} for the local Atkin–Lehner eigenvalue.

Conjecture 1. If #HF,d,S(X)\#\mathcal H_{F,d,S}(X)\to\infty, then for every η=(ηq)qS{±1}S\eta=(\eta_{\mathfrak q})_{\mathfrak q\in S}\in\{\pm1\}^S,

limX#{OHF,d,S(X):Wq(O)=ηq for all qS}#HF,d,S(X)=2S.\lim_{X\to\infty} \frac{\#\{O\in\mathcal H_{F,d,S}(X):W_{\mathfrak q}(O)=\eta_{\mathfrak q} \text{ for all }\mathfrak q\in S\}} {\#\mathcal H_{F,d,S}(X)} =2^{-|S|}.

Numerical evidence

The available data contain 7526875268 genuine orbits with 109751109751 reliable local observations at primes of exact level valuation one. The largest complete singleton family is

F=Q(2),d=1,F=\mathbb Q(\sqrt2),\qquad d=1,

at the inert prime of norm 99: the two signs occur 604604 and 608608 times. Over Q(5)\mathbb Q(\sqrt5), the analogous degree-one count is 334334 versus 304304.

Several two-prime samples are shown in Table 1; columns correspond to the four sign vectors in a fixed order.

family++++++-+-+--
Q(5)\mathbb Q(\sqrt5), selected primes of norms 44 and 55, all degrees141141163163164164165165
Q(5)\mathbb Q(\sqrt5), same pair, degree 115959777784847373
Q(5)\mathbb Q(\sqrt5), primes of norms 44 and 11118787767682828989
Q(5)\mathbb Q(\sqrt5), primes of norms 55 and 11116464656559596464
Q(5)\mathbb Q(\sqrt5), latter pair, degree 112929313131312929
Q(2)\mathbb Q(\sqrt2), degree 11, inert norms 2525 and 991212161620201212

Selected joint local-sign counts.

The finite samples are compatible with uniformity, but meaningful tests for larger sets SS, large fixed degrees, and many base fields are not yet available.

Fourier reformulation

Put

Nd(X)=#HF,d,S(X)N_d(X)=\#\mathcal H_{F,d,S}(X)

and, for TST\subseteq S, define the sign correlation

CT(X)=OHF,d,S(X)qTWq(O).C_T(X)=\sum_{O\in\mathcal H_{F,d,S}(X)} \prod_{\mathfrak q\in T}W_{\mathfrak q}(O).

The identity

1{W(O)=η}=2STSqTηqWq(O)\mathbf 1_{\{W(O)=\eta\}} =2^{-|S|}\sum_{T\subseteq S} \prod_{\mathfrak q\in T}\eta_{\mathfrak q}W_{\mathfrak q}(O)

shows that Conjecture 1 is equivalent to

CT(X)=o(Nd(X))for every nonempty TS.C_T(X)=o(N_d(X)) \qquad\text{for every nonempty }T\subseteq S.

Atkin–Lehner signs are constant on Galois orbits. Since every orbit in the family has degree dd, passing from orbit sums to sums over conjugate eigenforms multiplies both CTC_T and NdN_d by dd; the difficulty is therefore not the orbit weighting itself.

Local Plancherel heuristic

At a prime q2DF\mathfrak q\nmid2D_F of conductor exponent one and trivial central character, the local representation is an unramified quadratic twist of the Steinberg representation. The two possibilities have opposite Atkin–Lehner signs and equal local Plancherel mass. Exact-new Plancherel equidistribution consequently predicts independent uniform signs in the ambient spectrum.

The exact rationality-degree condition is global and is not the eigenspace of a known trace-formula operator. Bounded-degree forms have density zero in the full spectrum, so ambient equidistribution does not determine their internal sign distribution. Excluding CM and base-change forms imposes two further global restrictions.

Why twisting does not prove the result

A quadratic twist can flip prescribed local Steinberg signs while preserving the Hecke field, but generally introduces auxiliary conductor. It may send levels bounded by XX to levels bounded by cXcX rather than preserving the same cutoff, and it need not preserve the literal non-base-change family. A bijection between two differently scaled height ranges does not imply equality of same-cutoff densities without regular variation of the counting function. Narrow class number one also eliminates a general supply of nontrivial everywhere-unramified quadratic characters that would give a level-preserving involution.

Main obstacles

A proof requires fixed-degree correlation estimates

OHF,d,S(X)qTWq(O)=o(#HF,d,S(X))\sum_{O\in\mathcal H_{F,d,S}(X)} \prod_{\mathfrak q\in T}W_{\mathfrak q}(O) =o\bigl(\#\mathcal H_{F,d,S}(X)\bigr)

for every nonempty TT, after removing CM and base-change orbits. No asymptotic count is known for the denominator itself, and no trace formula isolates exact Hecke-field degree. The analogous question is open even for classical weight-two newforms of a fixed rationality degree at varying prime level. A refined version of the conjecture may need to condition on the complete local representation type at primes dividing the discriminant of FF or at other systematically ramified places.

References

  • J. Binder, Fields of rationality of cusp forms, Israel J. Math. 222 (2017), 973–1028.

  • R. Schmidt, Some remarks on local newforms for GL(2)\mathrm{GL}(2), J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 17 (2002), 115–147.

  • K. Martin, Refined dimensions of cusp forms, and equidistribution and bias of signs, J. Number Theory 188 (2018), 1–17.

  • Z. Luo, Q. Pi and H. Wu, Bias of root numbers for Hilbert newforms of cubic level, J. Number Theory 247 (2023), 378–409.

  • L. Dieulefait, A. Pacetti and P. Tsaknias, On the number of Galois orbits of newforms, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 23 (2021), 2833–2860.

  • J. Weinstein, Hilbert modular forms with prescribed ramification, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2009), 1388–1420.

Paper edition

Read or download the typeset paper

The PDF contains the same complete journal-style article presented above.

Open paper PDF