Conjecture 037

Unit signatures and common index divisors in S₅-quintic fields

Conjecture
RetainedLMFDB tested & reviewed
Field
Algebraic Number Theory
Domain
quintic fields; unit signatures; common index divisors; narrow class groups
Review
Unresolved
  • quintic fields
  • unit signatures
  • common index divisors
  • narrow class groups
  • local-global independence
Added Updated

Photograph: Nick Fewings / Unsplash

Open paper PDF

Summary

We conjecture that, after fixing the signature and the squarefree or nonsquarefree discriminant regime, the limiting unit-signature distribution of discriminant-ordered S₅-quintic fields is independent of the exact set of common index divisors. The conjecture separates an archimedean 2-primary invariant from finite local splitting conditions at 2 and 3.

Abstract

We conjecture that, after fixing the signature and the squarefree or nonsquarefree discriminant regime, the limiting unit-signature distribution of discriminant-ordered S5S_5-quintic fields is independent of the exact set of common index divisors. The conjecture separates an archimedean 22-primary invariant from finite local splitting conditions at 22 and 33.

Families and signature rank

Let K/QK/\mathbb Q be an S5S_5-quintic field of signature (r1,r2)(r_1,r_2), and define

sgnrk(K)=dimF2im(sgn:OK×{±1}r1).\mathop{\mathrm{sgnrk}}(K)= \dim_{\mathbb F_2}\mathop{\mathrm{im}}\bigl(\operatorname{sgn}:\mathcal O_K^\times\longrightarrow\{\pm1\}^{r_1}\bigr).

For r2{0,1}r_2\in\{0,1\}, put r1=52r2r_1=5-2r_2. The case r2=2r_2=2 has only one real place and hence a deterministic signature rank, so it is omitted.

Fix η{sf,nsf}\eta\in\{\mathrm{sf},\mathrm{nsf}\} and T{2,3}T\subseteq\{2,3\}. Let Fr2,η,T(X)\mathcal F_{r_2,\eta,T}(X) be the Q\mathbb Q-isomorphism classes of S5S_5-quintic fields with

DKX,I(K)=T,|D_K|\le X, \qquad I(K)=T,

and with squarefree discriminant precisely when η=sf\eta=\mathrm{sf}.

Conjecture 1. For every r2{0,1}r_2\in\{0,1\} and η{sf,nsf}\eta\in\{\mathrm{sf},\mathrm{nsf}\}, there is a probability measure νr2,η\nu_{r_2,\eta} on {1,,r1}\{1,\ldots,r_1\} such that, for every TT for which the stratum is infinite and every ss,

limXPrKFr2,η,T(X)(sgnrk(K)=s)=νr2,η(s).\lim_{X\to\infty} \Pr_{K\in\mathcal F_{r_2,\eta,T}(X)}\bigl(\mathop{\mathrm{sgnrk}}(K)=s\bigr) =\nu_{r_2,\eta}(s).

In particular, the limiting distribution is independent of TT.

The measure is allowed to depend on squarefreeness. Thus this conjecture is compatible with a separate ramification bias while asserting independence from the exact common-index obstruction.

Numerical evidence

The reliable windows contain 162022162022 totally real fields and 225089225089 fields of signature (3,1)(3,1). Table 1 compares the full-signature-rank frequency in the upper halves of the two largest common-index strata.

signaturediscriminantT=T=\varnothingT={2}T=\{2\}difference
(5,0)(5,0)nsf41.253%41.253\%42.287%42.287\%1.0341.034 pp
(5,0)(5,0)sf36.092%36.092\%38.182%38.182\%2.0902.090 pp
(3,1)(3,1)nsf75.457%75.457\%76.741%76.741\%1.2841.284 pp
(3,1)(3,1)sf70.963%70.963\%71.395%71.395\%0.4320.432 pp

Upper-shell full-signature-rank frequencies.

The four-shell trajectories for T=T=\varnothing and T={2}T=\{2\} show broadly parallel height drift. The T={3}T=\{3\} samples contain only a few hundred fields in the upper shells and fluctuate by several percentage points in both directions. They do not yet distinguish a genuine limiting shift from sampling noise. The T={2,3}T=\{2,3\} stratum is absent from the reliable finite windows.

Heuristic motivation

The unit-signature rank is an archimedean component of the 22-Selmer signature map. By contrast, the condition I(K)=TI(K)=T is determined by the splitting behavior at the finite primes 22 and 33. Once the broader ramification regime is fixed by squarefreeness or nonsquarefreeness, a product law between these archimedean and finite local data is a natural first model.

The fieldwise identity

hK+hK=2r1sgnrk(K)\frac{h_K^+}{h_K}=2^{r_1-\mathop{\mathrm{sgnrk}}(K)}

links signature deficiency to the difference between narrow and ordinary class groups. It constrains the possible values of sgnrk(K)\mathop{\mathrm{sgnrk}}(K) but does not force a dependence on the common-index set.

Relation with known results

Dummit and Voight conjecture the complete unconditioned unit-signature distribution for odd-degree SnS_n-fields of fixed signature. Their model is based on the maximal totally isotropic image of the 22-Selmer signature map. Bhargava’s geometric sieve and local counting theorems give linear asymptotics for the underlying S5S_5-field strata, while the common-index criterion makes I(K)=TI(K)=T a finite local condition at 22 and 33. None of these results counts fields marked by unit-signature rank.

The conjecture therefore has two layers: existence of each conditioned signature distribution, and equality of those distributions across TT. Even the first layer is open for the unrestricted discriminant-ordered S5S_5 family.

Main obstacles

Writing Nr2,η,T,s(X)N_{r_2,\eta,T,s}(X) for the number of fields in the stratum with signature rank ss, a proof requires

Nr2,η,T,s(X)=cr2,η,Tνr2,η(s)X+o(X)N_{r_2,\eta,T,s}(X) =c_{r_2,\eta,T}\,\nu_{r_2,\eta}(s)X+o(X)

with the same νr2,η\nu_{r_2,\eta} for every TT. The unmarked denominator asymptotic is accessible through acceptable local specifications. The marked numerator requires conditional equidistribution of the global unit-generated subspace inside the 22-Selmer signature space after fixing squarefreeness and the completions at 22 and 33. No current counting theorem provides this joint distribution.

References

  • D. S. Dummit and J. Voight, with an appendix by R. Foote, The 22-Selmer group of a number field and heuristics for narrow class groups and signature ranks of units, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 117 (2018), 682–726.

  • M. Bhargava, The geometric sieve and the density of squarefree values of invariant polynomials, arXiv:1402.0031.

  • M. Bhargava, The density of discriminants of quintic rings and fields, Ann. of Math. 172 (2010), 1559–1591.

  • H. T. Engstrom, On the common index divisors of an algebraic field, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (1930), 223–237.

  • J. V. Armitage and A. Fröhlich, Classnumbers and unit signatures, Mathematika 14 (1967), 94–98.

  • M. Bhargava and I. Varma, On the mean number of 22-torsion elements in the class groups, narrow class groups, and ideal groups of cubic orders and fields, Duke Math. J. 164 (2015), 1911–1933.

Paper edition

Read or download the typeset paper

The PDF contains the same complete journal-style article presented above.

Open paper PDF