Conjecture 035

Good-prime class groups of S₅-quintic fields with prescribed common index divisors

Conjecture
RetainedLMFDB tested & reviewed
Field
Algebraic Number Theory
Domain
quintic fields; class groups; Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet heuristics; common index divisors
Review
Unresolved
  • quintic fields
  • class groups
  • Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet heuristics
  • common index divisors
  • local conditions
Added Updated

Photograph: Nick Fewings / Unsplash

Open paper PDF

Summary

We propose a joint Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet law for the good-primary parts of class groups of discriminant-ordered S₅-quintic fields. The signature and the set of common index divisors are fixed. For primes not dividing |S₅|, the primary class groups are conjectured to follow the standard u-probability measure and to be asymptotically independent across distinct primes.

Abstract

We propose a joint Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet law for the good-primary parts of class groups of discriminant-ordered S5S_5-quintic fields. The signature and the set of common index divisors are fixed. For primes not dividing S5|S_5|, the primary class groups are conjectured to follow the standard uu-probability measure and to be asymptotically independent across distinct primes.

The conjectural measure

Let K/QK/\mathbb Q be an S5S_5-quintic field of signature (52r2,r2)(5-2r_2,r_2), and put

u=4r2.u=4-r_2.

For T{2,3}T\subseteq\{2,3\}, let Fr2,T(X)\mathcal F_{r_2,T}(X) denote the Q\mathbb Q-isomorphism classes of such fields with DKX|D_K|\le X and I(K)=TI(K)=T, where I(K)I(K) is the set of common index divisors.

For a prime 7\ell\ge7 and a finite abelian \ell-group AA, define

μ,u(A)=c,uAuAut(A),c,u=j=u+1(1j).\mu_{\ell,u}(A)=\frac{c_{\ell,u}}{|A|^u|\mathop{\mathrm{Aut}}(A)|}, \qquad c_{\ell,u}=\prod_{j=u+1}^{\infty}(1-\ell^{-j}).

The Hall identity implies that μ,u\mu_{\ell,u} is a probability measure.

Conjecture 1. Assume that #Fr2,T(X)\#\mathcal F_{r_2,T}(X)\to\infty. For every finite set SS of primes 7\ell\ge7 and every collection of finite abelian \ell-groups (A)S(A_\ell)_{\ell\in S},

limXPrKFr2,T(X)(Cl(K)[]A for all S)=Sμ,u(A).\lim_{X\to\infty} \Pr_{K\in\mathcal F_{r_2,T}(X)} \bigl(\mathop{\mathrm{Cl}}(K)[\ell^\infty]\simeq A_\ell\ \text{for all }\ell\in S\bigr) \mathrel{=} \prod_{\ell\in S}\mu_{\ell,u}(A_\ell).

The restriction 7\ell\ge7 removes the primes 2,3,2,3, and 55 dividing S5=120|S_5|=120, where the naive Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet measure requires correction.

Numerical evidence

The reliable windows contain 885295885295 fields. Good-prime divisibility is very rare in signatures of large unit rank, as predicted by the factor Au|A|^{-u}. The observed counts are given in Table 1.

r2r_2fields7hK7\mid h_K11hK11\mid h_K711hK7\cdot11\mid h_K
00162022162022000000
11225089225089550000
22498184498184701701767600

Good-prime divisibility in the primary discriminant windows.

For r2=2r_2=2, the 77-divisibility counts by common-index set are

566423127,12869654,75300,0103\frac{566}{423127},\qquad \frac{128}{69654},\qquad \frac{7}{5300},\qquad \frac{0}{103}

for T=,{2},{3},{2,3}T=\varnothing,\{2\},\{3\},\{2,3\}, respectively. The conjectural nontrivial-primary probabilities for u=2u=2 are approximately

1c7,2=0.003399914,1c11,2=0.000826389.1-c_{7,2}=0.003399914, \qquad 1-c_{11,2}=0.000826389.

The current frequencies lie well below these limits. They increase substantially across successive discriminant quarters: for r2=2r_2=2, the numbers of fields with 7hK7\mid h_K are

65,172,228,23665,\\172, \qquad 228, \qquad 236

in quarters containing respectively 103380103380, 125475125475, 132514132514, and 136815136815 fields. No 4949- or 121121-divisibility occurs in the primary windows, and the absence of a joint 771111 event has little statistical force because the conjectural expectation is only about 1.41.4.

Heuristic motivation

For non-Galois SnS_n-fields, the Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet formalism uses the augmentation representation. In the S5/S4S_5/S_4 situation its relevant rank is the unit rank u=4r2u=4-r_2, giving precisely the measure μ,u\mu_{\ell,u} at primes 120\ell\nmid120. Distinct good primes are expected to behave independently.

The condition I(K)=TI(K)=T is determined by the completions at 22 and 33. It is therefore natural to expect independence between this small-prime local condition and unramified abelian \ell-extensions for 7\ell\ge7. Conjecture 1 is the assertion that this heuristic survives discriminant ordering and the exact common-index conditioning.

Relation with known results

Wang and Wood give a modern moment interpretation of the Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet distributions for non-Galois fields, and Wood formulates local-condition refinements in other settings. Bhargava’s quintic counting theorem provides the underlying locally specified field counts, but not class-group statistics. The strongest theorem-level analogues concern particular torsion moments in lower-degree or specially parametrized families. No good-prime class-group distribution is known even in the unconditioned discriminant-ordered S5S_5-quintic family.

Moment formulation and obstacles

For a finite abelian \ell-group BB, the conjectural measure is characterized by the moments

E#Sur(Cl(K)[],B)=Bu.\mathbb E\,\#\operatorname{Sur}(\mathop{\mathrm{Cl}}(K)[\ell^\infty],B)=|B|^{-u}.

Thus even the first C7C_7 moment requires

1#Fr2,T(X)KFr2,T(X)#Sur(Cl(K),C7)7u.\frac{1}{\#\mathcal F_{r_2,T}(X)} \sum_{K\in\mathcal F_{r_2,T}(X)} \#\operatorname{Sur}(\mathop{\mathrm{Cl}}(K),C_7) \longrightarrow 7^{-u}.

By class field theory this is a count of unramified cyclic degree-seven extensions of locally specified quintic fields. Joint independence requires all mixed moments at finitely many primes, as well as tightness sufficient to recover the full distribution. Existing quintic parametrizations count the base fields but do not count these unramified towers.

References

  • H. Cohen and J. Martinet, Etude heuristique des groupes de classes des corps de nombres, J. Reine Angew. Math. 404 (1990), 39–76.

  • W. Wang and M. M. Wood, Moments and interpretations of the Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet heuristics, Comment. Math. Helv. 96 (2021), 339–387.

  • M. M. Wood, Cohen–Lenstra heuristics and local conditions, Res. Number Theory 4 (2018), Paper No. 41.

  • M. Bhargava, The density of discriminants of quintic rings and fields, Ann. of Math. 172 (2010), 1559–1591.

  • H. T. Engstrom, On the common index divisors of an algebraic field, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (1930), 223–237.

  • A. Bartel and H. W. Lenstra Jr., On class groups of random number fields, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 121 (2020), 927–953.

Paper edition

Read or download the typeset paper

The PDF contains the same complete journal-style article presented above.

Open paper PDF