Conjecture 035
Good-prime class groups of S₅-quintic fields with prescribed common index divisors
ConjectureSummary
We propose a joint Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet law for the good-primary parts of class groups of discriminant-ordered S₅-quintic fields. The signature and the set of common index divisors are fixed. For primes not dividing |S₅|, the primary class groups are conjectured to follow the standard u-probability measure and to be asymptotically independent across distinct primes.
Abstract
We propose a joint Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet law for the good-primary parts of class groups of discriminant-ordered -quintic fields. The signature and the set of common index divisors are fixed. For primes not dividing , the primary class groups are conjectured to follow the standard -probability measure and to be asymptotically independent across distinct primes.
The conjectural measure
Let be an -quintic field of signature , and put
For , let denote the -isomorphism classes of such fields with and , where is the set of common index divisors.
For a prime and a finite abelian -group , define
The Hall identity implies that is a probability measure.
Conjecture 1. Assume that . For every finite set of primes and every collection of finite abelian -groups ,
The restriction removes the primes and dividing , where the naive Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet measure requires correction.
Numerical evidence
The reliable windows contain fields. Good-prime divisibility is very rare in signatures of large unit rank, as predicted by the factor . The observed counts are given in Table 1.
| fields | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Good-prime divisibility in the primary discriminant windows.
For , the -divisibility counts by common-index set are
for , respectively. The conjectural nontrivial-primary probabilities for are approximately
The current frequencies lie well below these limits. They increase substantially across successive discriminant quarters: for , the numbers of fields with are
in quarters containing respectively , , , and fields. No - or -divisibility occurs in the primary windows, and the absence of a joint – event has little statistical force because the conjectural expectation is only about .
Heuristic motivation
For non-Galois -fields, the Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet formalism uses the augmentation representation. In the situation its relevant rank is the unit rank , giving precisely the measure at primes . Distinct good primes are expected to behave independently.
The condition is determined by the completions at and . It is therefore natural to expect independence between this small-prime local condition and unramified abelian -extensions for . Conjecture 1 is the assertion that this heuristic survives discriminant ordering and the exact common-index conditioning.
Relation with known results
Wang and Wood give a modern moment interpretation of the Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet distributions for non-Galois fields, and Wood formulates local-condition refinements in other settings. Bhargava’s quintic counting theorem provides the underlying locally specified field counts, but not class-group statistics. The strongest theorem-level analogues concern particular torsion moments in lower-degree or specially parametrized families. No good-prime class-group distribution is known even in the unconditioned discriminant-ordered -quintic family.
Moment formulation and obstacles
For a finite abelian -group , the conjectural measure is characterized by the moments
Thus even the first moment requires
By class field theory this is a count of unramified cyclic degree-seven extensions of locally specified quintic fields. Joint independence requires all mixed moments at finitely many primes, as well as tightness sufficient to recover the full distribution. Existing quintic parametrizations count the base fields but do not count these unramified towers.
References
-
H. Cohen and J. Martinet, Etude heuristique des groupes de classes des corps de nombres, J. Reine Angew. Math. 404 (1990), 39–76.
-
W. Wang and M. M. Wood, Moments and interpretations of the Cohen–Lenstra–Martinet heuristics, Comment. Math. Helv. 96 (2021), 339–387.
-
M. M. Wood, Cohen–Lenstra heuristics and local conditions, Res. Number Theory 4 (2018), Paper No. 41.
-
M. Bhargava, The density of discriminants of quintic rings and fields, Ann. of Math. 172 (2010), 1559–1591.
-
H. T. Engstrom, On the common index divisors of an algebraic field, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (1930), 223–237.
-
A. Bartel and H. W. Lenstra Jr., On class groups of random number fields, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 121 (2020), 927–953.
Paper edition
Read or download the typeset paper
The PDF contains the same complete journal-style article presented above.